Accreditation of higher education in the United States: opinion of the courts

Authors

  • Gonzalo Zapata State University of New York

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31619/caledu.n26.245

Keywords:

higher education, accreditation agencies, law courts

Abstract

Accreditation of higher education in the United States dates a long way back, in comparison to the rest of the world. Since the approval of the G.I. Bill in 1952, accreditation has played a major role in regulating higher education. It has had a direct impact on the possibilities of obtaining public funding for educational institutions. The purpose, scope, methodology and result of accreditation processes have not always been understood and have given rise to conflicts that have ended up in court. This study reviews United States jurisprudence in a series of cases -mainly brought before federal courts- between accreditation agencies and higher education institutions. The paper aims to examine the principles to be drawn from the experience of United States courts which, under their laws and regulations, contribute to a fair relationship among agencies and educational institutions in matters involving accreditation.

Downloads

Published

2007-05-03

Issue

No. 26 (2007): Revista Calidad en la Educación: Educación Superior: Diversidad y Acceso

Section

MISCELÁNEA

License

Authors retain their Copyright and only transfer a part of these to the journal, accepting the following conditions:

Authors keep their rights as authors and guarantee the right to the journal for the first publication of their work, which is simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution license allowing third parties to share the study accrediting the author and first publication in this journal.

Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the version of the published work (e.g. inclusion in an institutional thematic file or publication in a monographic volume) accrediting initial publication in this journal.

Authors are allowed and recommended to share their work over the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematic files or their website) before and during the submission process, which may lead to interesting exchanges and increased citation of the published work. (See The effect of open access).