The Professionalization of Management from the Gaucho Quality and Productivity Program: The Case of Unilasalle Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31619/caledu.n42.56Keywords:
universities, quality, higher education management, management model, Gaucho Quality and Productivity ProgramAbstract
It is undeniable that over the past few years we have witnessed a repositioning of the importance of the development of human capital and advanced strategic management in organizations. Given this reality, this study's central objective is to analyze the results of the Gaucho Program of Quality and Productivity (PGQP) in the professionalization of the management of the University, Unilasalle Canoas, Brazil. It is a qualitative case study, with a documentary analysis of: Institutional Development Plan (IDP); Management Report on the Gaucho Program of Quality and Productivity -RG-PGQP 2013 (by its Portuguese acronym)- and the Report Balanced Scorecard (BSC) 2010-2013. The results are translated into speeches and emerging practices for the criteria of the PGQP that contribute to the professionalization of the university management model of Unilasalle: leadership, strategies and plans, client, society, information and knowledge, people, processes and results. The results suggest the consolidation of the management processes of the institution from the respective tool in analysis.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Calidad en la Educación
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain their Copyright and only transfer a part of these to the journal, accepting the following conditions:
Authors keep their rights as authors and guarantee the right to the journal for the first publication of their work, which is simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution license allowing third parties to share the study accrediting the author and first publication in this journal.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the version of the published work (e.g. inclusion in an institutional thematic file or publication in a monographic volume) accrediting initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and recommended to share their work over the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematic files or their website) before and during the submission process, which may lead to interesting exchanges and increased citation of the published work. (See The effect of open access).