Doctoral Programs in Chile: A Typological Proposal to Explore Their Diversity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31619/caledu.n49.580Keywords:
cluster analysis, diversity, doctoral programs, quality, typologyAbstract
Chile has experienced an accelerated development of doctoral programs. In recent years, the offer has doubled, and the variety of options has significantly expanded with the creation of programs in new areas of knowledge, in different territorial contexts, of an interdisciplinary nature, organized collaboratively among universities. The study seeks to describe and understand the diversity of this offer with the aim of enriching quality improvement initiatives for the programs. Through a cluster analysis, a typology of doctoral programs was constructed based on nine variables that account for four dimensions: inputs, processes, outputs and outcomes.
The typology describes and reveals the horizontal diversity within the system, differing from the logic of other tools, such as rankings. The results show an offer organized around five types of programs: strong, consolidated, emerging, developing and weak. The diversity of the system has an ambivalent character: on the one hand, the development of programs in new areas of knowledge, in different territorial contexts and with new characteristics; on the other, the vast differences between the types of programs show that the system does not currently guarantee equivalent quality levels for doctoral students.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain their Copyright and only transfer a part of these to the journal, accepting the following conditions:
Authors keep their rights as authors and guarantee the right to the journal for the first publication of their work, which is simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution license allowing third parties to share the study accrediting the author and first publication in this journal.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the version of the published work (e.g. inclusion in an institutional thematic file or publication in a monographic volume) accrediting initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and recommended to share their work over the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematic files or their website) before and during the submission process, which may lead to interesting exchanges and increased citation of the published work. (See The effect of open access).