A comparative reasearch about evaluations university students made on two models of e-learning.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31619/caledu.n34.129Keywords:
e-learning, e-learning education models, e-learning evaluation, e-learning evaluation factorsAbstract
This article summarizes the outcomes from a research carried out by a Chilean university aimed to compare the evaluations two groups of students made on two different e-learning models. These models differ in multiple factors. However both are explained, as well as the theoretical review leading to the creation of an instrument to assess such factors. Results show that when comparing the evaluations of the different factors of the two e-learning models, learners from the newly implemented e-learning model have a significantly higher evaluation of the relevant system than those who studied under the previous model. Finally, the implications of these results are discussed.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain their Copyright and only transfer a part of these to the journal, accepting the following conditions:
Authors keep their rights as authors and guarantee the right to the journal for the first publication of their work, which is simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution license allowing third parties to share the study accrediting the author and first publication in this journal.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the version of the published work (e.g. inclusion in an institutional thematic file or publication in a monographic volume) accrediting initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and recommended to share their work over the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematic files or their website) before and during the submission process, which may lead to interesting exchanges and increased citation of the published work. (See The effect of open access).
