University quality measurement in Chile: The influence of rankings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31619/caledu.n44.36Keywords:
fact-totem, performativity, university quality, sociotechnical, agency, university rankingsAbstract
This article focuses on the analysis of performative effects of rankings on university quality, showing the main results of a qualitative study on a sample of Chilean universities. From a sociological perspective and assimilating the presence of a fact-totem, a critical analysis of university rankings is presented in regards to its production and release, showing the subscribed quality model. The article describes the effects the rankings have on institutions and how the modeling of the current concept of quality operates, through an agency network which they are part of, along with the media and representatives of the participating universities, whom are ascribed a performative role. Finally, following the metaphor of imagining the ideal university, elements excluded from the current definition of university quality are identified and offered as a new reference, considering aspects such as the idea of community, improved teaching, and relevant research among others.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain their Copyright and only transfer a part of these to the journal, accepting the following conditions:
Authors keep their rights as authors and guarantee the right to the journal for the first publication of their work, which is simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution license allowing third parties to share the study accrediting the author and first publication in this journal.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the version of the published work (e.g. inclusion in an institutional thematic file or publication in a monographic volume) accrediting initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and recommended to share their work over the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematic files or their website) before and during the submission process, which may lead to interesting exchanges and increased citation of the published work. (See The effect of open access).