Evaluating Faculty Members on their Work in Research and Creation.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31619/caledu.n31.170Keywords:
evaluation, faculty member, research, creation, academic qualificationAbstract
This work describes the evaluation process of faculty members in academic activities such as research and creation. It is aimed at reaching universal criteria relevant to all disciplines in order to objectify the evaluation of the individual academic performance. To this end. this process focuses in comparing scientific and art areas. Likewise. it presents a series of specific considerations related to the evaluation of each area and points out the relevant parameters to be evaluated. This analysis could be helpful for other institutions also having to evaluate an academic activity that is diverse in its nature always taking into account that research and creation are all sources of knowledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain their Copyright and only transfer a part of these to the journal, accepting the following conditions:
Authors keep their rights as authors and guarantee the right to the journal for the first publication of their work, which is simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution license allowing third parties to share the study accrediting the author and first publication in this journal.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the version of the published work (e.g. inclusion in an institutional thematic file or publication in a monographic volume) accrediting initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and recommended to share their work over the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematic files or their website) before and during the submission process, which may lead to interesting exchanges and increased citation of the published work. (See The effect of open access).
