Data use and school improvement: Understanding meanings and practices underlying educational decision-making processes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31619/caledu.n45.25Keywords:
accountability, education management, education quality assurance policy, reflexive use of dataAbstract
The implementation of the National System of Quality Assurance in Education (SNAC) in Chile, fosters a relationship between ministerial agencies and schools characterized by the production of external evaluations and data to guide school improvement. The present article contributes information on the challenges public schools face, in response to the first implementation phase of SNAC performed by the Quality Assurance Agency (ACE). To this end, and based on a review of international literature, the authors propose a conceptual definition of data highlighting a reflexive approach. This definition was employed to study four municipal schools located in the Metropolitan Region. The main findings of the study illustrate the strategies and processes of data analysis/use, performed by the schools, along with identifying the factors that influence these actions. The findings further underscore the strong influence of accountability on how the school actors conceptualize the value and use of data provided by SNAC, which influences how this data is used to inform school decision-making. The article suggests guidelines for education policy that would promote a contextualized, timely, and systemic use of data in municipal schools.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain their Copyright and only transfer a part of these to the journal, accepting the following conditions:
Authors keep their rights as authors and guarantee the right to the journal for the first publication of their work, which is simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution license allowing third parties to share the study accrediting the author and first publication in this journal.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the version of the published work (e.g. inclusion in an institutional thematic file or publication in a monographic volume) accrediting initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and recommended to share their work over the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematic files or their website) before and during the submission process, which may lead to interesting exchanges and increased citation of the published work. (See The effect of open access).