Logic and interests of social scientists to study a master's degree abroad: implications for Becas Chile
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31619/caledu.n40.72Keywords:
graduate studies, rationalities, interests, Becas ChileAbstract
This paper analyses the expansion of higher education and in particular the boom of graduate studies in Chile. It contrasts discursive and theoretical assumptions of public policy encouraging graduate studies, particularly through Becas Chile program, with the perspective of those who are doing graduate studies. The study attempts to understand the interests of undergraduate students that have completed their degree on social sciences to pursue a Master's degree abroad. It uses an exploratory and descriptive qualitative methodology based on literature and 14 in-depth interviews. Based on the Bourdieu approach, this project is framed under a theoretical prism emphasizing that actions and decisions are reasonable rather than rational and therefore they can involve different rationalities of action (not only instrumental). Results show the existence of at least two rationalities motivating the pursuing of these studies: a strategic rationality oriented to the insertion into the labor market and an experiential one oriented to individuation. As it could be seen, these findings may imply important consequences for public policy in graduate education.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Calidad en la Educación
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain their Copyright and only transfer a part of these to the journal, accepting the following conditions:
Authors keep their rights as authors and guarantee the right to the journal for the first publication of their work, which is simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution license allowing third parties to share the study accrediting the author and first publication in this journal.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the version of the published work (e.g. inclusion in an institutional thematic file or publication in a monographic volume) accrediting initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and recommended to share their work over the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematic files or their website) before and during the submission process, which may lead to interesting exchanges and increased citation of the published work. (See The effect of open access).